« Cisco UC Phone Proxy & A Few Gotchas & IOS-fu #3 | Main | Nexenta SAN - Part 2 - Thinly Provisioned 250TB iSCSI Volume »



Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.


Interesting that you are using 21 drives in a single zvol. I was under the impression that fewer disks = better performance and stability. Also impacts the time it takes to replace a failed drive?

From the ZFS best practices guide specific to RAIDZ:
The recommended number of disks per group is between 3 and 9. If you have more disks, use multiple groups.

Is there a reason you are using 21 disks in a group? Or did I miss something in your configuration?

DW Hunter

Hey Ty, you've got a great question. This is a couple years ago, and this particular situation was unique - needed a CRAP TON of storage just for replication. It was not primary storage. Normally, I would not do RAIDZ1 and normally I would not put that many drives ina single ZVOL. What I didn't post here was that this was rebuilt, with different hardware, and different RAIDZ2 config (using 12 disks - still too many probably but met my storage requirements)

When I deal with "normal storage" - I keep a RAID5 between 5-9 disks as the sweet spot for balance between read/write performance.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Your Information

(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)

Twitter Updates

    follow me on Twitter